As the humanitarian crisis in Ukraine worsens, Cardinal Konrad Krajewski, Prefect of the Dicastery for the Service of Charity, launches a forceful appeal to support fundraising efforts by the Basilica of Saint Sophia in Rome, gathering blankets, thermal clothing, and supplies.

Read all

 

Two lambs were presented to Pope Leo XIV on the liturgical feast of St. Agnes, in keeping with an ancient tradition of the Roman Church.

Read all

 

A statue of St. Carlo Acutis has been inaugurated in Myanmar, and a diocesan priest describes it as offering an example to young people on how to live their faith, “even in times of trial, especially during this difficult time the nation is experiencing.”

Read all

 

Pope Leo XIV invites the faithful to pray for Christian unity and for peace, especially in our time marked by a lack of respect for human dignity and heightened international tensions.

Read all

 

During his weekly General Audience, Pope Leo XIV reminds the faithful that nothing can separate us from the love of Christ, as he continues his catechesis on the Dogmatic Constitution 'Dei Verbum' on Divine Revelation.

Read all

 

Jan 20, 2026 / 17:07 pm (CNA).

Following a tragic train accident that occurred on Sunday evening, Jan. 18, in the Spanish town of Adamuz in the Córdoba province, the Catholic Church is providing pastoral care for those affected.

In addition to the help offered immediately after the accident by the local parish priest and the provision of diocesan resources by Bishop Jesús Fernández of Córdoba after he visited the scene of the accident on Monday morning, the diocese has assigned a team of three priests to the area.

The priests, Leopoldo Rivero, Francisco J. Granados, and Manuel Sánchez, will remain at the Poniente Sur Civic Center in Córdoba, the support center for the families of the victims, for as long as needed.

In a statement, the diocese emphasized the importance of a priestly presence in “a place where despair and uncertainty take their toll as people search for any indication as to the whereabouts of their loved ones.”

Rivero stated that with its presence, the Church is providing “the spiritual care so necessary at this time,” as rescue operations continue, given that many passengers are still missing and may be trapped in the wrecked train cars.

To date, authorities have confirmed the deaths of 41 people and the transfer of 152 injured people to hospitals, where they are receiving treatment, some of them still in very serious condition. At least 43 people remain missing.

Psychologists are referring “families who need [pastoral care] to the priests so that they can be with them, accompany them, and pray with them so that they feel warmth, closeness, and comfort,” Rivero added.

This story was first published by ACI Prensa, the Spanish-language sister service of EWTN News. It has been translated and adapted by EWTN News English.

Jan 20, 2026 / 16:37 pm (CNA).

Pope Leo XIV and leaders of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter (FSSP), a community dedicated to the traditional Roman rite, held a “cordial half-hour meeting” on Monday, Jan. 19, at the apostolic palace.

The priestly fraternity said in a Jan. 20 statement that the Holy Father received in private audience its superior general, Minneapolis-born Father John Berg. Also present was Father Josef Bisig, a co-founder of the FSSP and its first superior general, who now serves as rector of the FSSP’s Our Lady of Guadalupe Seminary in Denton, Nebraska.

The FSSP is a society of apostolic life of pontifical right founded in 1988 by priests who broke with Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, the founder of the Society of St. Pius X, precisely in order to remain fully under the Roman pontiff while preserving the older liturgy.

The FSSP’s leaders, who had requested the meeting, said in a cautiously worded statement that it was “an opportunity to present to the Holy Father in greater detail the foundation and history of the fraternity as well as the various forms of apostolate that it has been offering to the faithful for almost 38 years.”

They added that the papal audience also provided an “opportunity to evoke any misunderstandings and obstacles that the fraternity encounters in certain places and to answer questions from the supreme pontiff.”

The audience came at a sensitive time for the fraternity and for those who value the traditional form of the Latin rite as a whole following Pope Francis’ 2021 motu proprio Traditionis Custodes that imposed sweeping restrictions on parishes and communities dedicated to the traditional Roman rite.

Due to Traditionis Custodes, the FSSP is currently undergoing an apostolic visitation initiated by the Holy See in late 2024. The visitation is part of a broader process of accompanying institutes formerly under the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei but that now, due to Traditionis Custodes, fall under the auspices of the Dicastery for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life.

Both the FSSP and the dicastery have both stressed that the apostolic visitation is not punitive but a normal exercise of oversight so the dicastery can “know who we are, how we are doing, and how we live so as to provide us with any help we may need.” The fraternity also underwent an apostolic visitation in 2014.

Although Pope Francis gave the FSSP a kind of protected but precarious niche, explicitly exempting it from some of the restrictions in a Feb. 11, 2022, decree, the priestly fraternity was still subjected to tighter structural control and scrutiny than under Benedict XVI. That decree arose from a prior private audience between Pope Francis and FSSP leaders.

Monday’s meeting was therefore significant, representing Leo XIV’s first clear, personal outreach to a leading traditional community and showing his willingness to listen to their concerns.

It also follows on the heels of the Holy Father granting Cardinal Raymond Burke the celebration of a pontifical Mass in St. Peter’s Basilica last October, along with the pope’s willingness to grant case-by-case exemptions to some traditional communities. The pope appears to be pursuing a policy of “pragmatic leniency” with such communities, neither willing to undo Francis’ liturgical changes but also not enforcing them with the same rigor.

Observers have therefore welcomed Monday’s meeting and are taking solace in the fact that the Church now has an American pope willing to listen to a fellow American superior general of a traditional order at a time when, according to one insider, “the waters are rough.” Berg also brings much experience to his role, having already served as the fraternity’s superior general from 2006 to 2018.

Like many traditional Roman rite communities and parishes, the FSSP is a flourishing community with several hundred priests and seminarians worldwide, a steady flow of vocations, and well-attended liturgies.

In its communique, the FSSP said Pope Leo XIV gave his blessing, “which he extended to all members of the fraternity.”

“The Fraternity of St. Peter is grateful to the Holy Father for offering this opportunity to meet with him,” the statement concluded, adding that it “encourages the faithful to continue to pray fervently during the 30 days novena of preparation for the renewal of its consecration to the Immaculate Heart of Mary on Feb. 11.”

Jan 20, 2026 / 16:07 pm (CNA).

“We have the good news that our culture needs to hear: that men and women are ordered to the good and made for amity for each other. Our embodied, sexed nature has been ordered for our salvation.”

So said Leah Sargeant, a former atheist and author who delivered the final keynote at a recent conference in Houston titled “The Beauty of Truth: Navigating Society Today as a Catholic Woman.”

At the conference, sponsored by the Catholic Women’s and Gender Studies program at the University of St. Thomas on Jan. 9–10, Sargeant suggested that our culture’s view of sexuality is premised on two lies. First, that “women’s equality is premised on being interchangeable with men,” and second, that “autonomy is foundational to a fully human life.”

To the first point, she noted that “it’s been common for people who advocate for women to minimize differences [between the sexes].”

Based on this lie, women, she said, are seen as “defective men.”

However, she continued, “the fundamental asymmetry between men and women is how we engender and bear children.”

It is based on this premise that the second lie, that individual autonomy is fundamental to being fully human, gets its strength, she said.

‘Forming a society open to dependency’

Sargeant said that when a woman is pregnant with another human being, the baby’s dependence and fragility does two things: It makes the baby’s life seem less valuable to those who believe autonomy is required to be fully human, and it makes the woman less-than when compared with a man, who never biologically has to enter into such a dependent relationship.

“The idea of having our lives upended by someone else [the baby’s] is a blow to women’s equality. This is the original argument for women’s access to abortion,” she said.

“The right to privacy wasn’t good enough because men always have the opportunity to abandon a child: that only required an act of cowardice. He could walk away, run, leave no forwarding address, and sever the connection. For a woman, she couldn’t divorce herself from her child by failing to step up: It would require outside, active, violent intervention in the form of poison or a scalpel.”

Women had to have what Sargeant called “an equality of vice” with men: namely, abortion. They had to “access to this cowardice as well or they could not be interchangeable with men and would lose political equality.”

Fundamentally, she concluded, both men and women must reject the lies of sameness and the “lie of autonomy” and be “radically dependent on God” and one another to live in the truth.

She quoted St. John Henry Newman, who wrote that “we cannot be our own masters. We are God’s property, by creation, by redemption, by regeneration … Independence was not made for man. It is an unnatural state that may do for a while, but will not do till the end.”

Sargeant reminded her listeners that we should not be afraid to “invite others into our lives or be ashamed to place demands on others.”

“We were always made to need each other,” she said. “We are not betraying ourselves when we expose ourselves as deeply human.”

Our task, she said, “is to give people reassurance that this truth is good,” reminding them that “hope doesn’t come from excesses of strength but in the midst of our frailty, and reminds us of how we are loved, and by whom.”

Sargeant's talk at the conference was based on her latest book, "The Dignity of Dependence: A Feminist Manifesto," which was released in October 2025.

Jan 20, 2026 / 15:37 pm (CNA).

The Cristero War in Mexico, also known as the “Cristiada,” was not only an armed conflict but also a head-on clash between a state seeking forced secularization and a society that refused to renounce its Catholic identity. This bloody episode left a legacy of martyrs and a historical wound that has marked the complex relationship between the church and state in modern Mexico.

Background: The 1917 constitution

The conflict did not erupt overnight. Its roots lie in the 1917 Mexican Constitution, which incorporated anticlerical articles designed to subject the Church to the absolute control of the state.

Article 3 prohibited religious corporations and ministers of religion from operating primary schools. Article 5 banned the establishment of monastic orders and the taking of religious vows. Article 24 limited public worship to the interior of churches, always under government supervision. Article 27 stripped churches of their legal capacity to own property, transferring such property to the nation. Article 130 denied legal personality to churches, barred ministers of religion from participating in politics, and empowered individual states to limit the number of priests. These provisions formed the legal basis for the anticlerical enforcement that culminated in the “Calles Law,” which intensified the restrictions and sparked the Cristero War.

In 1926, President Plutarco Elías Calles escalated the situation with the “Law on Crimes and Offenses Related to Religious Worship and External Discipline,” also known as the “Law of Religious Tolerance” or simply the “Calles Law,” which amended the penal code by establishing severe penalties.

Among its harshest restrictions, the new law prohibited priests from wearing cassocks or any other religious symbols outside of churches, subjecting violators to fines and imprisonment. Priests who were not born in Mexico faced fines and deportation. The establishment of monastic orders or convents was banned, and existing convents were dissolved. Additionally, ministers of religion were forbidden from criticizing the fundamental laws of the country, the authorities in particular, or the government in general.

The Catholic Church’s response was drastic, unprecedented, and disciplined among all the Mexican archbishops and bishops: On July 31, 1926 — with the Holy See rejecting the “Calles Law” and “any act that could signify or be interpreted by the faithful as an acceptance of the law itself” — public worship was suspended throughout Mexico.

The outbreak

“It is indeed the suspension of religious services that may mark the beginning of the Cristero War, states the Franco-Mexican historian Jean Meyer in the opening pages of the first volume of his work “La Cristiada.”

Meyer quotes a letter from some Cristeros to their parish priest, who had been arrested by the authorities and urged the Cristeros to surrender: “Without your permission or command, we threw ourselves into this blessed struggle for our freedom, and without your permission or command, we will continue until we win or die.”

Thus, in different parts of the country, Catholic faithful spontaneously rose up in arms.

The willingness to engage in armed resistance against the government was not unanimous. “The bishops undoubtedly preached resistance,” Meyer notes, but at the same time, “they specified that they wanted no resistance other than passive and peaceful resistance.”

Although many prelates provided pastoral support to the Cristeros in some way, “the enemies of armed action were more numerous,” he points out.

Nor was the situation uniform among the priests. A list compiled by the Franco-Mexican historian indicates 100 “priests were actively hostile to the Cristeros,” while 40 were “actively favorable to the Cristeros.” Five priests are recorded as “combatants,” while 65 were considered “neutral.”

The number of priests “who abandoned rural parishes and priests from cities” totaled 3,500, while the priests “executed by the government” numbered 90.

It was “the people, ‘the Indian,’” who reacted, the historian says, and they did so “violently” because “the Church was more than just a building of piled-up stones, and popular sentiment had been struck to its very core, since the profane and the sacred are inextricably intertwined.”

“The people, the vast majority or many peasants — who were the ones who fought the guerrilla war most fiercely in the states of Jalisco, Guanajuato, Michoacán, Colima, and other central states — didn’t have much theology ... nor did they make many distinctions between things, but rather it was something, let’s say, of the heart and of religious feeling ..., of love for their faith,” that motivated them, the apostolic administrator of the Diocese of Cancún-Chetumal, Bishop Pedro Pablo Elizondo Cárdenas, told ACI Prensa, the Spanish-language sister service of EWTN News.

Some key figures

It is difficult to compile a specific list of the key figures and those who lost their lives at the hands of the anticlerical federal troops, especially considering that the Mexican Bishops’ Conference estimates that there were “more than 200,000 martyrs who gave their lives defending their faith."

But to understand the magnitude of the Cristero War, it is necessary to identify some of the actors who spearheaded the movement, as well as the figures who embodied the spiritual resistance against federal persecution.

The Cristero resistance was coordinated by the National League for the Defense of Religious Liberty — known as “The League" — which, although it managed to secure 2 million signatures in an attempt to reform the 1917 Constitution (an effort that ultimately failed) and organized a relatively successful boycott, threw itself into war effort without being “prepared to face the situation," according to Meyer.

Blessed Anacleto González Flores, known as “Maestro Cleto” and also nicknamed the “Socrates of Guadalajara” in reference to his origin in the state of Jalisco, was a layman who led peaceful efforts to confront the persecution by the government and was martyred on April 1, 1927. He is the patron saint of the Mexican laity.

St. José Sánchez del Río, affectionately called Joselito (“dear little José”), was martyred at the age of 14. He joined the war assuring his mother that “it had never been so easy to gain heaven as now, and I don’t want to miss the opportunity.” He was captured, tortured, and killed. Before dying, he asked that this message be delivered to his parents: “Long live Christ the King, and we will see each other in heaven.”

The photograph of the execution of Blessed Father Miguel Agustín Pro on Nov. 23, 1927, shows the Jesuit priest with his arms outstretched in the form of a cross in front of the firing squad. It is one of the most powerful symbols of the brutal religious persecution suffered by Catholics during the first half of the 20th century.

Among those murdered out of hatred for the faith during the religious persecution unleashed by the federal government, six priests who were members of the Knights of Columbus stand out. This fraternity played a leading role, both economically and socially, in supporting religious freedom during that tragic period in Mexico, even to the point of offering their own lives.

The six priests, canonized by Pope John Paul II in 2000, are Luis Bátis Sáinz, José María Robles Hurtado, Mateo Correa Magallanes, Miguel de la Mora de la Mora, Rodrigo Aguilar Alemán, and Pedro de Jesús Maldonado Lucero. All of them were canonized on May 21, 2000, along with 19 other Mexican martyrs, including St. Cristóbal Magallanes.

‘Agreements’ of 1929 and the end of hostilities?

Officially, the Cristero War ended on June 21, 1929, with the so-called “Agreements” between Mexican Archbishop Leopoldo Ruiz y Flores, as apostolic delegate of Pope Pius XI; the bishop of Tabasco, Pascual Díaz; and the then-president of the country, Emilio Portes Gil, successor to Plutarco Elías Calles.

However, the “Agreements” did not entail any changes to the 1917 Constitution or the “Calles Law” but rather established a “modus vivendi” in which the federal government committed to not applying the laws to persecute Catholics, while the bishops resumed religious services and the Cristeros laid down their arms.

But the persecution was far from over. Meyer writes that “for the Cristeros, the ‘modus vivendi’ (a way to peacefully coexist) very quickly became a sinister ‘modus moriendi’ (a way to die), suffered as a trial worse than the war itself and borne like a cross, an incomprehensible mystery which they underwent out of love for the pope and for Jesus Christ the King.”

Meyer notes that “all the former Cristeros say: ‘More people died after the “Agreements” than during the war.’”

“In the capital of the republic, the party line was to assure and repeat that everything was over, but in the records of the Ministry of War, there are reports of campaigns up to 1941 and the generals discussing the means of subduing the rebels, who were sometimes very dangerous, here and there,” Meyer writes in another part of the first volume of “La Cristiada.”

This period is commonly considered the “Second Cristero War,” but Meyer points out that “if the first stage (1926–29) of the Cristero War was already a war [fought by] the poor, the second was a war of the destitute, without resources, without support.”

Long road to religious freedom in Mexico

It would not be until 1992 — after two visits to Mexico by Pope John Paul II, in 1979 and 1990 — that relations between church and state would be formally reestablished in the country with a reformed 1917 Constitution and the new and current “Law on Religious Associations and Public Worship,” which allows for the recognition of the legal personality of the Catholic Church.

Only since 1992 has the Catholic Church been allowed to own churches in Mexico, but all those built before that year — including the Guadalupe Basilica (completed in 1976) — are the property of the nation.

However, current law still prohibits both religious associations and ministers of religion from owning or managing “radio or television stations or any type of telecommunications” as well as “managing any of the mass media.” In fact, the law only permits the publication of “printed materials of a religious nature.”

A call from the Mexican bishops on the centenary

In their most recent message to the faithful, the Mexican bishops called for “honoring the memory” of the “Cristero resistance.”

They warned that this centenary “cannot be a mere nostalgic commemoration. It must be an examination of conscience and a renewed commitment.”

“Our martyrs ask us today: Are we willing to defend our faith with the same radical commitment? Have we lost our sense of the sacred? Have we become complacent in a culture that wants to relegate faith to the private sphere?”

This story was first published by ACI Prensa, the Spanish-language sister service of EWTN News. It has been translated and adapted by EWTN News English.

Jan 20, 2026 / 15:07 pm (CNA).

The ongoing protests in Iran are considered the largest in years, both in duration and geographic spread. Since erupting on Dec. 28, 2025, demonstrations have continued without interruption, expanding across the country’s north, south, east, and west. Large numbers of Iranians from diverse social and religious backgrounds have taken part, including Christian citizens.

Human rights and church reports indicate that some Christian participants have been killed, injured, or arrested by Iranian security forces. The overwhelming majority of Christians in the Holy Land are Eastern Orthodox or Catholic.

According to ARTICLE 18, a London-based nonprofit dedicated to the protection and promotion of religious freedom in Iran, seven Iranian Christians of Armenian origin were killed in recent days by security forces. Armenian media outlets, however, have so far confirmed only one victim by name: Ejmin Masihi, who was killed in the capital, Tehran, amid unconfirmed reports that three other Iranian Armenians were wounded.

In addition, one Christian reported that police opened fire on two of his nephews in the city of Shiraz. Both were transferred to a hospital for treatment.

Christians have played a notable humanitarian role during the protests. Hormoz Shariat, president of Iran Alive Ministries, told ACI MENA, the Arabic-language sister service of EWTN News, that a number of Christians have been providing food and water to demonstrators.

Shariat recounted that a Christian couple prepared approximately 50 sandwiches, carrying them in backpacks along with bottles of water to distribute in the streets. He said other Christians have been treating injured protesters in their homes, away from the eyes of authorities, noting the case of one demonstrator who later converted to Christianity after learning that the nurse who stopped his bleeding was a Christian.

Concerns for the safety of Christians are mounting amid the tense security situation, particularly as churches in Iran, both official congregations and underground house churches, maintain spiritual ties outside the country.

Observers warn that any discussion of foreign political interference, or even allegations of it, could make Christians an easy target for accusations or a “scapegoat” within the broader security crackdown.

In this context, Barnabas Aid reported that at least 10 Christians were arrested in three different locations in Fars province in western Iran before Jan 4. Citing one pastor from an unregistered church, the organization reported: “Security forces raided the homes of several believers, accusing us of providing ideological fuel for the street protests. Our people remain confined to their homes, yet the raids continue relentlessly.”

Anxiety has intensified notably over the past week following the Iranian government’s complete shutdown of internet access, which has made it increasingly difficult to verify developments on the ground.

The blackout has further heightened fears of arbitrary arrests or extrajudicial killings under the cover of chaos, especially targeting Christians, who are considered among the most vulnerable groups during this sensitive period.

This story was first published by ACI MENA, the Arabic-language sister service of EWTN News. It has been translated and adapted by EWTN News English.